1. goesbumpinthenight reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  2. kim-quim reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  3. lightsaurora reblogged this from hey-its-tsai
  4. specspectacle reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  5. hey-its-tsai reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  6. selfteachingillustrator reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  7. jmskitten04 reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  8. cherrycolouredx reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice and added:
    I’ve posed for almost every panel in my thesis comic, negl.
  9. letslearnart reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  10. reddoorsandlemontrees reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  11. stillneedtogrow reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  12. felliss reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
  13. juicywuicy reblogged this from amazinglyartisticadvice
Tagged as: oh wow i want that book. Norman Rockwell.
Reblogged from: penmouse
Originally posted by: penmouse

penmouse:

Using photo reference correctly (written by Emily G on CA.org)

Is it ok to use photographic reference when making art?
Yes. In fact, it can be a very smart thing to do.

 This is a scan from Norman Rockwell’s book Rockwell on Rockwell: How I Make a Picture. In his early career, Rockwell created his illustrations using live models. Later on, he adopted photography and projection because of their convenience and time-saving qualities.

Because of his excellent drawing skills, Rockwell can use the reference as the basis to create exactly the type of character he wants. Notice all of the small changes he makes. Sticking too close to the reference is often called “being a slave to the reference” and can result in characters that look too stiff or posed.

Also, if there are problems in the photo where the pose is not exact or clear, someone who can only trace will copy these problems into the final image. A skilled artist can solve the problems in the drawing.

Is it ok to use other people’s photos as reference?

It depends. Just like you own the copyright to your art, a photographer owns the copyright to his or her photos.

 If you copy all or most of someone else’s photo without permission, this could be a copyright violation.There is no rule that says “if you change it X%, then it’s ok.” In U.S. courts, the test is if a reasonable observer could look at the original and the copy side-by-side and tell that it is a copy. It is ok to copy someone else’s photo as much as you want if it is only for your personal study. It is considered a courtesy to acknowledge your source if you then show that work to anyone.

 Here are some examples of ways artists can use others’ photos as reference:
Using individual, generic parts of a photo. Ex. A tree, hills, clouds.
Using individual, specific parts of a photo. Ex. The Empire State Building, a Jeep. 
For historical research. Ex. Looking at pictures of WWII uniforms to get the design accurate.

Gathering multiple photos of a subject without using a specific one. Ex. Looking at many photos of lions to see how they are built and how they move.

Using multiple photos for general inspiration. Ex. Gathering photos of different kinds of machinery in order to get inspiration for your own machine design.

Read more on conceptart.org

370 notes Permalink Reblog